S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: To Kill or Spare Nimble?

In S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: Heart of Chornobyl, players encounter Nimble during the "In Search of a Guide" quest. The decision to kill or spare him presents a moral dilemma with tangible consequences. This article analyzes the rewards and impacts of each choice, guiding players toward the optimal strategy.

S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: Heart of Chornobyl

GSC Game World

Pre-register: 6350Release Date: COMING SOON

Action

Pre-register

The Nimble Dilemma: Kill or Spare?

The quest to find Nimble in Snork Cave, after gathering intel from Skadovsk and Shevchenko, leads to a crucial decision. Killing Nimble offers minimal loot – some basic items and a map – with no significant long-term effects on the game's narrative or factions. The information he provides verbally is largely redundant with the data found on his PDA after his death.

The Financial Incentive of Mercy

Conversely, sparing Nimble yields a substantial reward of 2,699 coupons – a considerable sum early in the game – significantly boosting your resources and easing the early-game grind. This financial advantage far outweighs the meager loot obtained from killing him. While the narrative impact of either choice remains minimal, the economic benefits of sparing Nimble are undeniable.

Navigating the Snork Cave Encounter

Reaching Nimble involves navigating the challenging Snork Cave, filled with dangerous mutants. The article provides guidance on dealing with these encounters, ensuring players can successfully reach Nimble regardless of their chosen path. This practical advice complements the analysis of the moral choice, providing a complete guide for players.

The Verdict: Mercy Trumps Might

Ultimately, while the choice is yours, the evidence strongly suggests sparing Nimble. The significant financial reward from sparing him far outweighs the negligible benefits of killing him. This makes sparing Nimble the superior strategic choice, allowing players to progress with a substantial boost to their resources early in the game. The minor narrative impact doesn't justify losing out on a substantial early-game advantage.